Self-Explanation Strategies enhance the inhibition of intuitive misconception: Insights from ERP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63174/xdi.OETN9214Abstract
To investigate the persistence of deeply entrenched intuitive misconceptions in science learning, this study examined the effectiveness and neural underpinnings of the self-explanation strategy (SES) in correcting the misconception that “ionic compounds consist exclusively of metal cations and nonmetal anions.” Participants were required to judge whether compounds qualified as ionic. By comparing behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) data between the Traditional Instruction Group (TIG) and the Self-explanation Strategy Group (SSG) when processing intuition-consistent (C) and intuition-inconsistent (IC) ionic compound stimuli, we found that C stimuli elicited larger P2 amplitudes, while IC stimuli evoked stronger N2 and LPP components. In contrast, the SSG exhibited reduced P2 amplitudes and enhanced N2 amplitudes under C conditions. These results indicate that persistent misconceptions require inhibitory control, and that self-explanation weakens early intuitive activation while enhancing conflict monitoring to promote inhibition.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in X-Disciplinarity are open access and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Under this license, authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the work while allowing others to copy and share it for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given and the work is not altered or transformed.